by Hinda Cohen
Sarah had wanted
to be a teacher since she was in elementary school when her favorite activity
was to play school with her friends. Sarah loved teaching alef-bais, ABCs, addition, and subtraction; you name it and Sarah
could teach it beautifully – to her friends, that is. Then came her first
opportunity to teach in her alma mater. Sarah was hired to teach a high school
secular subject to bright ninth graders. But Sarah only knew what she had been
taught in high school – and she had not saved her notes. Sarah was in trouble.
Soon the girls
began to misbehave. They scored poorly on her first test, which was too long,
making the girls late to carpool. No matter what help Sara received here and
there, she always seemed to face a new battle of either poor curricular or
pedagogic knowledge. One day, Sarah just returned her materials and quit, her
dreams shattered.
This “story” has
happened too many times to count. We live in a country that does not strongly
value the teaching profession. (Finland does, by the way: read The Smartest
Kids in the World by Amanda
Ripley, for some fascinating insights.) Add to this two years of COVID
disruptions and we are faced with deficits in our children’s academic progress
as well as widespread teacher shortages. Certain public school districts are in
such dire straits that they are taking parent volunteers as substitutes to
oversee large groups watching films in the auditorium. Our day schools are
suffering, too, with multiple job openings for teachers advertised in our local
media last summer and even during the school year. In fact, a girls school in a
major community was able to open this year for all but one grade; a letter was sent
home to the parents of the grade lacking teachers stating that their daughters
should simply not come to school!
With education in
both limudei kodesh and secular
studies a central pillar in our lives, the question is: How do we recruit and
retain the Sarahs of the community?
A Hidden Prize
We are rightly
proud of our local day schools, many of whose graduates have gone on to great
success in life. Yet, like public and private schools all over the country, our
schools are having trouble retaining and recruiting teachers. There are many
reasons for this, of course, but instead of trying to simply intuit solutions,
we can take advantage of educational research. And the major success factor
that research has uncovered is the school’s investment in professional
development for its teachers and administrators.
Enter Prizmah, the
Center for Jewish Day Schools and the premier organization for best practices
in education, which supports all Jewish day schools in the U.S. and Canada. A
highly professional, research-based organization, Prizmah offers many one- to
two-year programs on Zoom, forming cohorts of teachers and administrators
throughout the country who are striving for excellence in their roles.
Outstanding leaders in education present sessions, and participants may even
take part in the renowned Harvard University’s Center for Education in the
summer.
One Prizmah
initiative that some of our local schools have attended is You Lead, a program
for deepening and improving leadership capacity for administrators of day
schools. In the past, Beth Tfiloh participated and, more recently, Ohr Chadash
Academy (OCA). This nine-month leadership program personalizes its curriculum
for the needs of each cohort, and provides one-to-one mentoring to each
participant. It is based on the highest standards; that is, it is “research
based” and follows “best practices.” Although these terms may sound like empty
educational jargon, they are actually quite meaningful. The term “best
practices,” for instance, means that large groups have been studied to
determine what works educationally, which schools succeed or fail, and why.
To further
understand the importance of programs like You Lead, consider the words of Ohr
Chadash’s head of school, Mrs. Deborah Rapoport, describing Prizmah as
“extraordinary, unparalleled support,” and Rabbi Mordechai Bennett, middle
school principal, who believes You Lead enabled him to “discover myself as a
leader.” These research-based classes have enabled Mrs. Rapoport, herself a
doctoral candidate in education, to build a school culture where both students
and teachers strive to grow to their capacities. Through organizations like Prizmah,
as well as through the guidance of their head of school and onsite training
programs, Ohr Chadash provides leadership training on a rotation basis for all
its administrators.
Such programs are
based on adult learning theory, which stresses 1) building deep and satisfying
relationships between administration and staff, 2) allowing for autonomy in the
staff, and 3) having learners achieve mastery. At Ohr Chadash, administrators
and teachers sense these values strongly. And although every school has its
“holes” of uncovered classes, in general OCA has “excellent teachers applying
who are excited for the future of this school,” states Mrs. Rapoport.
Are Better Salaries the Answer?
Much is being
written about increasing teachers’ salaries as the way to retain and attract
teachers to our day schools. It is so important a topic that rebbe and teacher
salaries were a focus of both Torah U’Mesorah and Agudath Israel in recent
years. But let’s take a step back and reflect. Of course, work is intrinsically
connected to salary, and an insufficient salary definitely plays a large role.
However, the point cannot be made strongly enough: No amount of money will keep
a teacher at her challenging job when she lacks the consistent, personal
support of her administration in a tangible way. Candies and new books sent out
en masse at Yom Tov season are lovely, but this will not retain teachers.
Rather, creating a
school culture where every teacher is given opportunities for growth, where
every teacher counts, where the administration is in regular contact with every
teacher – listening, encouraging, appreciating, and offering direction in a
non-intimidating way – this will keep teachers. And these teachers will be
happy. This is the key to professional development in both large and small schools.
This is what Prizmah and other organizations provide to our schools. As Rabbi Bennett
reflects, “If you are taught about 10 new ideas, you resonate with five, and
you put three into practice in your school – that’s a win!’
Jewish New Teacher Project
Prizmah is not the
only program concerned with day school teachers. In speaking with Nina Bruder, executive
director of the Jewish New Teachers Project, I gained a greater understanding
of all that is being done to empower day schools to retain their teachers. JNTP
is a program under the auspices of the New Teacher Center (NTC). Its founding
program for new teachers is almost 20 years old. Over 200 day schools have
participated. In it, schools send experienced teachers to learn how to mentor
new teachers. Schools pay for their mentor-teachers to attend, but the program
is often underwritten, making it affordable. Over two years, mentor-teachers
attend half-day workshops, four-to-five evening classes per year, read, and do
homework. To date, teachers from Bnos Yisroel and Ohr Chadash Academy have
completed the program, and teachers from Bais Yaakov High School are currently participating.
Once the new
teachers to be mentored are selected, the mentor-teacher meets with her once a
week and observes her class twice a month. She guides the new teacher to find
her own solutions that suit her personality and mind. With her trusted go-to
person, the new teacher gains confidence in the classroom and learns to think
for herself. The typical weekly 45-minute mentoring session is driven by what
the new teacher wants to discuss, whether how to write a lesson plan or how to
decrease the chatter in the back of the room. Any topic in pedagogy is within
bounds, but, interestingly, curriculum is off bounds. JNTP’s approach is that a
math teacher might be a mentor for a Chumash teacher or vice-a-versa. An
English teacher may mentor a new science teacher.
Some participants
question this approach, feeling that the program works best when the mentor and
mentee are from the same department. The major question is, if the mentor is
mentoring only for pedagogy, then how will Sarah learn the methodology of
classroom instruction for her subject field? (In educational lingo, pedagogy
refers to the general principles and practices of teaching, while methodology
refers to a system of methods used in a particular discipline or area of study.)
How will Sarah learn the curriculum and its components, timing, and goals,
etc.? How will she learn the subject content she may be lacking? Nina Bruder
explains that mentoring in pedagogy is most successful when a department or
curriculum supervisor who is trained in content and methods is in place to
regularly supervise the new teacher in curriculum and methodology.
Unfortunately,
however, supervisors are spread very thin. Add to this that an untrained
supervisor seems like the “boss” to the new teacher, and you have a recipe for
a large dose of “fear of the supervisor.” To remedy this situation, JNTP opened
a program 10 years ago for new administrators to gain skills and study best
practices. Nearly 100 schools have participated in this program. So far this
year, there have been three all-day professional development seminars,
two-to-three night sessions, and five mentoring sessions. Each participant has
a mentor to turn to for help as he or she applies the learning to her work.
“I Hear You”
All too often, day
schools are stressful places to work, where overburdened administrators are
dedicated to making school a place where students thrive. But somehow, such a
school culture is failing as the lack of teachers – not to mention trained
teachers – demonstrates. Yet in a school culture in any city or community that
is based on the research-based principles of educational success, teachers
count. Administrators have time for their teachers. Teachers’ voices are
needed; teachers’ voices are heard.
In both Prizmah’s
and JNTP’s programs for administrators, the key principle is professional
development via research and best practices. Far too often, lower-level
administrators – and certainly teachers – feel like cogs in the wheel, like
worker bees in the hive. JNTP believes that a school’s success will skyrocket
when all its staff feels heard, when all its staff can take pride in improving
the school at their level and with their talents, and where growth and
excellence are the buzzwords of everyone working there.
In the words of
Mrs. Tzippy Levin, a veteran early childhood educator and recent assistant
director of Ohr Chadash Academy’s Early Childhood Learning Center, “We are all
life-time learners, growing in educational practices. JNTP is a ‘win-win’
situation. The program empowers us to do the best job possible, to strive for
excellence as a school.” Mrs. Levin explained that, too often, administrators
function on “survival mode” because they are stretched too thin. JNTP teaches
how to administrate in an optimal way. Mrs. Levin adds, “You do not know that
you do not know until you learn this.”
Mrs. Levin is
grateful for having learned so far how to effectively give a “quick classroom
visit,” have open-ended conversations and collaborate more effectively with teachers,
be more receptive to her staff, have that difficult conversation, and provide
specific feedback responses. Rabbi Bennett says his cohort training taught him
how to support teachers on a practical level during a weekly meeting with each
teacher, how to run meetings with a complex group of personalities, how to
observe classrooms effectively, and how to analyze assessments together with
teachers. Because of benefits such as these, Ohr Chadash Academy sends its
administrators on a rotating basis to this JNTP program, participates in JNTP
for new teachers, and has formed its own mentoring program as well.
Know What You Teach
We have discussed
the contributions of Prizmah and JNTP to pedagogy and administration. We are
now left with subject matter knowledge and teaching methodology. For example,
consider the common directive of “read the chapter in the textbook and do the
questions after it.” Is this how students learn to read independently and
critically? Do they learn algebra and mathematical thinking by practicing
problems and watching the teacher do the problem correctly on the board? And
finally, can a department chairman fill in this gap even by meeting frequently
after or before teaching hours?
Somehow, some or
all of this has become an accepted norm for a new teacher in many Jewish day
schools. Yet, if the teacher does not have specific classroom tools and subject
matter knowledge, she will not engage her students and bedlam must and will
appear. Remember Sarah?
Enter Beth
Tfiloh’s new program, Moreinu, developed by Rabbi Mordechai Soskil. This
initiative addresses the need for teachers to be mentored by a master teacher
in methodology for the same kodesh
area as the new teacher. While the teacher shortage is not strong at BT, this
program is meant to nurture new stars on the horizon for the school’s future.
One to two candidates will be chosen this year. They will have some
education-related experience such as camp counselor, etc., as well as strong
subject matter knowledge from excellent performance in yeshiva or seminary.
Most importantly, they will have the drive and excitement to succeed in
education.
The new teacher
candidate will observe the mentor-teacher. He or she will slowly be guided to
give lessons, always under the supervision and training of the mentor. After
some time, the candidate will teach one period a day, continuing to meet daily
with the mentor. The candidate will be paid for this training through funds
raised in memory of three outstanding Beth Tfiloh teachers. This is creative thinking
with powerful potential; perhaps it can even be adapted to secular studies.
Educating
Men to Educate Boys
Baltimore is also home
to a national educational organization called Machon Menoras Hachochmah: The Institute for Torah-Based Curricula, a
sister organization to Yeshivas Kesser Torah of Baltimore. The Machon creates
general studies educational curricula for yeshiva high school students that
combine standards-based excellence with content deeply rooted in the values of
our mesorah. It produces innovative
educational techniques and cutting-edge technology to deliver an experientially
engaging education as it prepares students for success in the 21st
century. Currently, the Machon’s content is utilized in close to 20 yeshivos
around the country.
Rabbi Mordechai
Weissmann, director of the Machon, explains that his organization is working
hard to alter the typical “teacher profile” for general studies teachers in mesivtas. A typical public school
teacher is not necessarily the best fit for bachurim.
Part of the Machon’s push to create Language Arts, History, and Science courses
with a Torah lens is to create opportunities for administrators to consider
different models for hiring teachers. There is no reason why mesivtas cannot look to elementary school
rebbeim, kollel yungeleit who want chinuch/teacher
experience, and other Jewish professionals to teach general studies classes.
Obviously, Rabbi Weissmann admits that such candidates need previous exposure
to writing, communication, and the subject matter they are teaching. However,
there are ways to solve this problem on the job via professional development –
the Machon has created a series of videos and documents for this purpose – and
options for remote graders to complement in-person teachers in a blended
learning environment.
One example of a
Machon course that allows for altering the “teacher profile” is an 11th
grade Language Arts class that asks students to delve into topics related to parshas hashavua and moadim. Students are presented with a
question and then research an English-Hebrew source packet. They then fine-tune
their reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. A series of
assignments are presented that ask students to take this material, further
their research, and work on various writing assignments. While the content for
the course is entirely Torah, it satisfies all state-mandated requirements and
is aligned with national Common Core standards. In Kesser Torah, specifically,
this course is taught by a veteran rebbe. He receives assistance in grading
from a remote grader, who provides students with feedback on their writing,
grammar, and mechanics.
A Modest Proposal
In contrast to
Beth Tfiloh, many other schools do experience teacher shortages in secular
subjects. Perhaps we can learn from an initiative proposed by TNTP, The New
Teachers Project, a secular organization that supports public schools. TNTP
recently published a booklet on new ways to attract and retain teachers, called
“Pipeline Model: Grow-Your-Own Certification Programs for High School
Students.”
TNTP’s guide
focuses on recruiting students into teacher certification programs while they
are still in high school. They are trained through a combination of
internship/apprenticeship experiences, scholarships, or grants, and are placed
in jobs after they graduate. Some programs even offer college credit for
coursework and field experience in high school. TNTP hopes it can attract,
invest, train, and retain young talent, thus creating a pipeline of local
teacher candidates.
Could this idea be
implemented in our day schools? With sufficient support in 12th
grade and a continuing personal connection after high school, our community
could benefit from such a program, especially combined with the recent
outstanding financial support of our national institutions in raising teachers’
salaries, an obviously necessary component.
Summing It Up
Teacher attrition
and retention is a grave topic and a complex problem. Do we only need higher
salaries? Highly doubtful. Will a pedagogy mentor who does not teach the same
subject matter as her mentee and a department chairman on “survival mode” be
sufficient to prevent the Sarahs of our communities from quitting? No.
Our teachers today
need ongoing training in all three areas: curriculum content, methodology, and
pedagogy. Moreover, teachers need to feel valued for their specific strengths.
A teacher will stay at her job when her school applies the research-based best
practices of adult learning to create a school culture of growth for students
and staff at all levels.
The task is
daunting, but if we as a community turn towards this research with the
knowledge that “wisdom is found among the nations,” we can begin to retain and
acquire excellent teachers. As a community, we all need to do our share to
address this issue. Don’t our children deserve this?
Sidebar 1
Interview with Mrs. Yaffa (Luchansky) Hill
Mrs. Hill is a
graduate of Yeshiva High of Silver Spring, where she took several AP courses
with certified AP-trained teachers. Following seminary in Israel, Mrs. Hill
completed a BA in Secondary English Education at Towson State University. Mrs.
Hill presently teaches ninth-grade Humanities and tenth-grade English at
Yeshivat Mekor Chaim.
Q: What would you say were the most valuable
aspects of your education at Towson State University?
A: Our program was based on a trifecta: a three-pronged
approach blending one’s content area, philosophy of education, and child
psychology, with an emphasis on the latter. I took at least nine psychology of
education courses and wrote around 18 papers for these classes. Every
assignment was related to education. For example, if we studied the research
about the need for relevance in a child’s learning, our psychology of education
professor would assign us to choose a work of literature from one of our
literature courses and write a lesson plan that stressed this principle, which
we handed in to our psychology professors!
Q: That certainly is a well-integrated program! What
about techniques of teaching secondary English? When did you study those?
A: We had several technique classes, where we learned
and practiced dozens of techniques for teaching all aspects of English. I also
learned even more techniques on the job. Once, my mentor-teacher shared with me
that she found the use of sentence strips helpful in teaching adjective
clauses. She took out these oak tag strips and showed me how to post them on
the blackboard to teach the need for a relative pronoun and its adjective
clause to appear next to the noun or pronoun it describes. Then I developed a
lesson plan using these sentence strips and taught the lesson plan. The plan
was reviewed, the lesson was reviewed, and I learned to use the sentence
strips.
Q: Can you tell me more about your student teaching? It
sounds like an intensive program!
A: It definitely was! I student taught for four months
in a middle school and another four months in a high school. At first, I would
observe, but by the end of the second month, I was teaching a full load of six
classes, meeting with my mentor-teacher three times a day, and often staying in
school until 9:00 p.m. grading papers and preparing lessons. But I loved it. I
was learning the skill of teaching secondary school English; I was learning to
craft techniques according to the psychological development of the children
before me.
Q: Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. You have
certainly opened our eyes to the benefits of a bachelor’s in a specific field
of education.