It is well known that Rav Moshe Feinstein used to complain
that the halachos of tzedakah
were among those about which he was asked too infrequently. Yet some of
the most common shailas I get have to
do with tzedakah.
The questions I will answer in
this article are: 1) May a parent use maaser
money to support married children in kollel? 2)
May one can pay tuition out of maaser kesafim funds? and 3) May
one ask Hashem to pay him back for the tzedakah money that he gave?
Which
Maaser?
Before I begin, we should first note that there are three
types of maaser. When the term maaser
is used in the Mishnah and Gemara
without specifying which one, it sometimes refers to maaser rishon,
and sometimes to maaser sheini, and, in later halachic
works, sometimes also to maaser kesafim. These three types of maaser
have vastly different laws from one another. Usually, one can understand from the
context which maaser is intended. If the context alludes to maaser
owned by a Levi, or to the first maaser being separated, maaser
rishon is intended. If it refers to something that has sanctity, usually
maaser sheini is intended. If it refers to a percentage of one’s
income that is donated to tzedakah, it refers to maaser kesafim.
Maaser
Kesafim
Maaser kesafim means giving ten
percent of one’s money to tzedakah. (The poskim dispute whe
A person who distributes maaser kesafim to
What
Is Chomesh?
Chomesh is giving 20
percent of one’s moneys to tzedakah. This is
Before starting to give regular amounts of tzedakah
on an ongoing basis, one should declare that he is following this procedure
bli neder, without accepting it as a vow.
Paying
for Your Kids in Kollel
“I agreed to support my married children for five years. May
I use maaser money for this?” The Chasam Sofer authored a
responsum (Shu’t Chasam Sofer, Yoreh Deah #231) on this
subject, which is fascinating for the many different halachic issues he clarifies. Someone had arranged the
marriage of his scholarly son to the daughter of a talmid chacham, with
the following understanding: The father of the son accepted that every week he
would pay a certain amount to his mechutan, the bride’s father, who
would sustain the young growing family in his home, thus enabling the
son-in-law to continue his studies under his father-in-law’s direction. The
father of the chassan realized that it would be difficult for him to
meet this commitment and wanted to know if he could use the maaser money
from his business endeavors to provide the support for which he is responsible.
The Chasam Sofer opens his discussion by quoting two
opinions that seem to dispute whether it is acceptable to use maaser
money for such an expenditure. The Rema, quoting the Maharil,
contends that it is not permitted to use maaser money to pay for a
mitzvah, such as donating lamps and candles to the shul, whereas the Shach
states, in the name of the Maharam, that it is permitted to use maaser
money for mitzvos. Thus,
whether one may pay for mitzvos other
than supporting the poor from maaser money appears to be a dispute among
early authorities.
The Chasam Sofer then quotes the Be’er Hagolah,
who explains that the two above-quoted opinions are not in dispute. All
authorities prohibit using maaser money to fulfill a mitzvah that
someone is already obligated to observe. The Maharam, who permitted
using maaser money for these purposes, was discussing a case in which
the donor intended to use maaser money for this mitzvah from the outset,
whereas the Maharil is discussing a situation in which he has been using
his maaser money to support the poor, in which case he cannot now divert
it for other mitzvos that do
not qualify as tzedakah for the poor. Thus, according to the Be’er
Hagolah, whether the father can begin meeting his obligations to his son
and mechutan with his maaser money will depend on whether he has
already accepted the obligation on himself to pay this from other funds, in
which case he cannot use maaser money for it, or if it is an
obligation that he is now accepting upon himself, in which case he can specify
that he wants to use maaser money to fulfill it.
The Chasam Sofer does not consider the approach of
the Be’er Hagolah to be fully correct. He (the Chasam Sofer) notes
that the Maharil wrote that maaser moneys are meant to support
the poor and not for the acquisition of mitzvos.
Therefore, use of maaser money for any type of personal mitzvah is
inappropriate, whether he is already obligated to fulfill the mitzvah or not.
The Chasam Sofer concludes that when someone begins donating
maaser money he may stipulate that, sometimes, the money will be used
for a mitzvah donation, such as the lighting in shul. However, once he
has begun donating his maaser money regularly to the poor, he must continue
using it for tzedakah.
Priorities
Having determined that there are definitely situations in
which maaser money must be given to the poor, the Chasam Sofer
then discusses when and whether money designated for the poor can be used to
support an individual’s extended family. There is a general rule that one is
obligated to the poor to whom one is closest – close family first, more distant
family next, neighbors third, members of one’s city next, and the out-of-town
poor next.
Notwithstanding that family should be supported first, the Chasam
Sofer quotes from his rebbi, the author of the Haflaah, that
the rules of “closest first” or “family first” are only when the funds are
necessary for the same level of need, for example, all have enough to eat, but
not enough for clothing. However, if some are short of food, and others have
enough to eat but are short on clothing or other needs, the responsibility to
make sure that someone has enough to eat comes first, even for someone out of
town, regardless of whether there are neighbors or locals who are needy, as
long as they have sufficient food.
Yet, concludes the Chasam Sofer, this prioritization
is not absolute. All needs of someone’s family are considered his
responsibility before the basic needs of others. In other words, the priorities
should be as follows:
·
Family needs
·
Most basic needs – food –
regardless of location of needy
·
People of one’s city
·
The out-of-town poor
The Chasam Sofer’s Conclusion
If the father had stipulated, at the time of obligating
himself to support his son, that he would use maaser money for this
obligation, he would be able to use it. Even then, the Chasam Sofer
recommends that he use only up to half of his available maaser money to
support his son. His reasoning is based on a Mishnah (Peah 8:6),
which says that someone is permitted to save his maaser ani (the tithe
one gives to the poor in the third and sixth year of the shemittah
cycle) to support those whom he chooses to, but he should not set aside more
than half of his maaser ani for this purpose; the rest should be given
to the local poor.
However, this is only when he had originally planned to use maaser
money for this purpose. Otherwise, once he created an obligation upon himself
to support his son, it is similar to any other obligation that he has, and he
may not use his maaser money for this purpose.
Paying Tuition
May one pay tuition for his child out of maaser kesafim? Rav Moshe Feinstein
ruled that one should not pay tuition for sons and daughters in elementary
school and high school from maaser funds, because this level of
education is obligatory. However, someone eligible for a tuition reduction who
elects to pay full tuition may pay
Yeshiva gedolah tuition and expenses may be paid from maaser
because a parent is not obligated to support a child at this age.
Testing
Hashem!
At this point, let us discuss the last of our opening
questions: “May I ask Hashem to pay me back for the tzedakah money that
I give?”
It is generally prohibited to “test” Hashem, as
However,
The Gemara (Taanis 9a) relates that, after
Reish Lakeish’s passing, Rabbi Yochanan encountered his nephew (who was Reish
Lakeish’s son). Rabbi Yochanan asked his nephew what he had learned in cheder
that day. The nephew replied, “Te’aser kedei shetis’asher,” “Give maaser
so that you get rich.”
“How do you know?” asked Rabbi Yochanan.
“Go test it,” answered
Rabbi Yochanan replied, “I heard from my rebbe, Rabbi
Hoshiyah, that this is an exception, because of
We see from this that it is permitted to declare that I am
giving