Reviewed by Rabbi Mordechai Shuchatowitz, Head of the
Baltimore Bais Din
We are all aware
of the many areas that technology has altered the way we live and the
challenges that it presents to Torah-observant Jews. One area in which
technology has brought about change throughout the entire world is the way we
make purchases. Go back just 20 years, and anyone wanting to buy food,
clothing, personal items, or business items would enter a brick-and-mortar
store to examine what was available for purchase and then buy the desired
items. In the world we currently live in, online purchasing has become a normal
way of shopping, which has put pressure on brick-and-mortar stores trying to
compete.
This phenomenon
leads to a halachic question. Yet the question applies not only to online
transactions. The technology may be new, but the halachas surrounding ethical
behavior between customer and businessperson are not.
* * *
We will present
the question first in the words of Rochel, an ehrliche balabusta. Rochel asks, “I find it convenient to shop for
shoes and clothing online. Many times, however, I see an item online and am not
sure that I want to purchase it based on a computer picture alone. I find that,
especially when buying shoes, I am much more comfortable actually seeing and
trying on the shoes before buying them. It would be very helpful to me to go to
a store that sells the shoes I am interested in. But since the store is likely selling
the shoes for a price higher that I can purchase them online, I know with
reasonable certainty that I will not be buying them from the store I entered. I
remember learning in a halacha class at school that one may not ask a
shopkeeper about buying an item if he/she is really not interested in
purchasing it. So what can I do? I really want to see the shoes live before
buying them online, but I also want to keep the halacha properly.”
* * *
Here is another
scenario, which is not linked to the phenomenon of online shopping but gives
rise to a similar question. We will present the question in the name of
Yitzchak, a father of young children.
Yitzchak asks, “I
find it a challenge to keep my children occupied when they are not in school;
they often complain that they are bored. One solution I thought of is to go to a
toy store and let the children browse and look at the toys. If I were to offer
my children such a trip, I would make it very clear to them that we will not be
buying anything, and that this would just be for the outing and for looking at
the toys. However, I am concerned about the halacha of entering a store without
any intent to purchase something.”
The Halachic Analysis
Rochel and
Yitzchak are fundamentally asking the same question: Is it halachically
permitted to enter a store and look at the merchandise when one has no intent of
buying anything.
The relevant halacha
is based on a mishna in Bava Metzia
(58b). The mishna states that one may
not inquire about merchandise if he does not intend to purchase it. The gemara adds that one may not browse
through a store’s merchandise when he/she does not have money and is not able
to make a purchase. The halacha considers this to be a form of ona’as devarim, causing someone pain
with one’s words or actions. The shopkeeper gets his or her hopes up when
seeing the potential customer, and the customer is causing the shopkeeper pain
because there is no chance that the customer will actually buy anything.
The mishna compares this to other forms of ona’as devarim. For example, one may not
say to a baal teshuva, “Remember how
you used to behave before you were religious?” Another example that the mishna gives is that one may not say to
a ger (convert), “Remember how your
(non-Jewish) forefathers behaved?”
The source of this
is from the pasuk in the Torah
(Vayikra 25:17) which forbids causing pain to another through words or actions,
and these halachos are codified in Choshen
Mishpat 228:4.
It would seem from
this halacha that Rachel and Yitzchak have an issue. They clearly do not plan
to make a purchase from the store they are entering, and are falsely getting up
the hopes of the proprietor who sees them enter.
However, there is
an important halachic distinction that should be made. In many of the stores
that we shop in, there is no relationship between the customer entering and the
owner of the store. This is due to the fact that the owners are not directly
involved in the running of the store, and the employees who work there are
usually hourly or salaried employees, and generally do not make any more or
less money based on a purchase by a given customer. Adding to all this is the
fact that there are often dozens and dozens of customers, and it is reasonable
to say that the staff pays no attention to the buying commitments of any particular
customer.
Given the above,
it would be permitted to enter a large store of this type, even though the
“customer” has no intention of buying. There would be more of an issue,
however, in a mom-and-pop type store, where the proprietor does have an
interest in the purchases of the customers who walk in. One way to avoid the
problem is to be upfront with the owner and tell him or her of your true
intent. If they give their consent, then there is certainly not a halachic
issue.
It can also be
added that there is another scenario that does not have a halachic issue, even
in a mom-and-pop store. Let’s say a customer is honestly interested in buying
an item but wants to do some comparison shopping. He or she enters numerous
stores and inquires about the price and qualities of a given item with the
intent of buying the one that is the best deal. This is a natural part of doing
business as a buyer and is permitted.[1]
We can see how halacha
teaches us sensitivity to others, not just in the words that we use but in our
behaviors, and how careful we must be with another’s feelings. We daven to
Hashem to give us the ability to deal with each other according to the Torah
standard of care and concern.
Rabbi
Rosenfeld administers cases for the Baltimore Bais Din. He may be reached at
RYR@baltimorebaisdin.org.
[1]
This case is discussed in Pischei Choshen
(Volume 4 Chapter 15 Note 15), where he permits this based on the reason
mentioned.